data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/697d9/697d9d4f53a40af85b9cf907212dd151493b5de4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9e21/e9e21ec6bd5caffbfa6cae6f6aedae5199855890" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01292/01292749cdad62d55bcc164fd67754760a14aba5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1c36/e1c3683f342324eafddbd9a51301e1f0a86171d9" alt=""
This fossil comes from the Lower Cretaceous aged Grayson Fm., Denton County, Texas.
As a comparison, here are the three Texas oysters that I've detailed in the last few posts side by side. From left to right: Texigryphaea navia, Texigryphaea marcoui, Ilymatogyra arietina
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0cb06/0cb0608eb78e2ae2fb0558be618d10dcb35bd2b1" alt=""
Hi - I save yesterday's Waldron Shale FM post. I'm thinking that the unknown fossil is Dalmanella elegantula. It's hard to tell from pictures, but it looks right.
ReplyDeleteBest regards - Jack Kesling /Drexel Hill, PA
Hi Jack, Thanks for the comment. I'm not sure about the Dalmanella ID as most specimens that I've seen are from the Ordovician and are flatter in profile while the shell I posted is from the Silurian. Also Dalmanella have a well defined, triangular interarea and a wider hinge line, unlike the specimen I posted.
ReplyDelete